Showing posts with label RDA assets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RDA assets. Show all posts

Monday, 18 April 2011

What will become of Grimethorpe?















The Government’s announcement earlier this month that 20 per cent of all land and property assets owned by the soon to be abolished regional development agencies (RDAs) will be sold on the open market – rather than being transferred to councils or the new local enterprise partnerships (LEPs) – will surely ruffle a few feathers.

For a start, a number of RDAs had stated in their asset disposal plans, submitted to the Government earlier this year, that they wanted a number of their assets to go to councils or LEPs so that they can continue to be managed locally.

Other RDAs had said in their plans that selling assets on the open market would not be preferable because this would exclude local authorities unable to place high enough bids to purchase land and property because of swingeing budget cuts.

They suggested that, as a solution, councils should take over some assets with a view to purchasing them at a later date when purse strings aren’t so tight – but the coalition has ruled out this option as well.

The RDAs declined to comment other than in basic statements "welcoming" the proposals. But I suspect that many in local government will consider it a blow that such a significant amount of state-owned property is being sold off to the private sector rather than being retained and benefit the local economy – particularly when you look at some of the assets earmarked for sale.

Included on the official list are a number of former coal and steel-mining sites, including the former Corus steelworks in Birmingham and Barnsley's Grimethorpe Colliery - which was made famous by director Mark Herman's 1996 film Brassed Off.

Nottinghamshire's Sherwood Energy Village, a not-for-profit business park that went into liquidation last year, is also on the list. It is unclear what impact the sale will have on the plans of a group of tenants who were last year looking into the possibility of setting up a workers' cooperative to take over ownership and/or management of the site.

The news also calls into question how Newcastle's planned development of the former Scottish & Newcastle Brewery site into a new science business and residential hub might progress once the site is sold off.

MPs have warned against a "fire sale" of RDA assets, claiming that this would be a bad idea "at a time when land prices remain depressed".

And, at Regeneration & Renewal’s Northern Summit in Manchester last October, delegates predicted a "smash and grab" of public land once the RDAs are abolished.

Are both these scenarios now looking increasingly likely? And would the assets be put to better use in private hands?

Photo by Draco2008

Thursday, 14 October 2010

Northern Summit: RDA asset fears















Fears of imminent "smash and grab"-style land reclaiming by the Government were fuelled earlier this week at the Northern Regeneration Summit in Manchester.

Delegates in a session at the Developers' and Investors' Forum at the summit heard that the Government Property Unit, part of the Shareholder Executive charged with finding efficiencies across the public sector estate, has suggested that public land currently owned by regional development agencies could be reclaimed by the Government as part of measures due to be announced in the Comprehensive Spending Review - read our preview series on that here - next week.

Might those reclaimed assets then be sold on to the private sector? Anything might be possible, delegates heard.

One of the many questions arising in recent weeks over the demise of the RDAs has been who or what would take control of public land owned by them. The delegate said it was not clear what assets could be seized but that they could include anything from derelict plots to public buildings. The prognosis for regeneration in the UK was "bleak", the delegate warned.

Concerns over Tax Increment Financing, a US-style funding tool that allows the cost of building infrastructure to be financed by borrowing against future tax revenues, were also raised by delegates attending the session. Phillip Wooley, a partner at urban regeneration firm Grant Thornton who was speaking at the event, said that while overall Tif was an effective funding model, it could be risky if future tax revenues were uncertain.

He said studies had also shown the use of Tif could lead to some organisations relying heavily on this form of funding. These, he added, are known as "Tif Tarts".

By HANNAH JORDAN